Well.
Nutbags.
Got an e-mail today from the fedjob I applied for last month, informing me that although qualified for the position, I was not 'best qualified' according to the self-assessment questionaire. (Big shock. Half the assessment questions were about about draft procedures.) So, my name will not be forward to the agency for consideration at this time, unless said agency requests additional names.
I can't say I'm shocked.
I knew as soon as I looked at the questionaire that the official job description was a bait-and-switch. It was advertised as generic office work, but over half the questions on the assessment related to money matters that weren't even mentioned in the description. So they totally had someone lined up for the position, but had to go through the motions of posting for official reasons.
Pheh.
Looking at USAJobs again...there's a couple of possibles. There's one for the Library of Congres that sounds interesting and something in NM.
Eh.
Screw it.
I'll wait until Monday.
More later! - MEL
Nutbags.
Got an e-mail today from the fedjob I applied for last month, informing me that although qualified for the position, I was not 'best qualified' according to the self-assessment questionaire. (Big shock. Half the assessment questions were about about draft procedures.) So, my name will not be forward to the agency for consideration at this time, unless said agency requests additional names.
I can't say I'm shocked.
I knew as soon as I looked at the questionaire that the official job description was a bait-and-switch. It was advertised as generic office work, but over half the questions on the assessment related to money matters that weren't even mentioned in the description. So they totally had someone lined up for the position, but had to go through the motions of posting for official reasons.
Pheh.
Looking at USAJobs again...there's a couple of possibles. There's one for the Library of Congres that sounds interesting and something in NM.
Eh.
Screw it.
I'll wait until Monday.
More later! - MEL